Adam Raskin Private Investigator
17375 ~ 415.642.7678 ~ fax: 415.642.4043 ~ cell:
415-846-6385
P.O. Box
41-0193
San Francisco, CA 94141 USA ~ email: raskpi@mindspring.com ~ Se
habla Espaņol
~ Home
~ FAQ ~
Blog ~
Adam's Blog:
October 14, 2008: Montreal Police Strike-
1969
October
2008 marks the 39th anniversary of the Montreal Police "general
strike." This was probably one of the few instances of a major
metropolitan North American police force pulling such a drastic
job action. It must also be viewed in context with the overall
political climate in Montreal, and Quebec in the late
1960's. There were liberal and radical sectors of the
province's sovereignty movement; other labor struggles; the battle to
remove Montreal mayor Jean Drapeau, a deep conservative who's
policies predated Rudy Giuliani's decades later; plus a huge
counter-cultural movement in Montreal at the time. I grew up
learning about the class struggle, but being there then I watched it
unfold.
On the eve of the strike, Drapeau and budgetary
henchmen were poised to cut police officer's benefit contributions, and
double their work loads. The largely Francophone force,
additionally protested growing wage disparities between their force,
and that of police forces in Anglophone communities surrounding
the city. Long traditional two-officer patrols were
slated to be replaced by one-officer patrols. Sound like a
familiar scenario?
On October 7,
1969, police union leadership and rank and file met at
Montreal's famed Paul Sauve Arena to decide how they would respond
to the labor attacks. They sent last minute demands to the
provincial government, which went unmet. The police force, numbering
some 4000 officers ultimately decided to take a "study
day," what we might call here a "sick-out."
Metropolitan firefighters joined in solidarity and went out on
strike as well.
There were many
bank robberies; much looting in central Montreal; a gun store was
ransacked; and Molotov cocktails were thrown. Doubtless there were
uncounted scores of common crimes that went unanswered. One
of the chief street battles that took place was between members and
supporters of the Taxi Liberation Movement, who took their struggle to
the headquarters of the Murray Hill Company. The latter had been
granted an exclusive and financially valuable contract to transport
airline passengers at Dorval airport, thus eliminating an
important Taxi drivers' take. A general state of "anarchy" ensued, as
local and provincial leaders as well as the media categorized
it. Two people were killed, including a provincial police
officer. There was other gunfire, and a couple of million
dollars in destruction resulted from the downtown "riot."
The provincial government did not delay in responding. Before
dawn of the next day October 8 Law 61 was in effect forcing
striking police to return to work or face penalties and even
imprisonment. Provincial police were called in, as was limited
federal army intervention by the famed 22nd Regiment, an all
French Canadian unit. Officers quickly returned to work as compelled;
nonetheless the general political climate in Quebec continued to
simmer.
What is the significance of
the Montreal Police Strike of 1969? More obscure, there was one
in 1943 when the issue was the officer's demand they be recognized as
public works employees which they were not at the time. In a
broader context the1969 strike, and the not
long-after Canadian federal postal workers strike, or even much
later, the US air traffic controllers actions that lead to Ronald
Reagan's mass firings, are representative of government imposing
strong measures on public sector workers. Federal and local
governments have concentrated their control over this growing sector of
the work force, the public sector. Their hard line, no job
actions tolerated stance, and subsequent laws enacted have
virtually crippled the sector's ability to exercise "theoretical"
labor rights.
But what does that
mean specifically in the case of police officers? Here
in the San Francisco Bay Area, many are aware of the City Of
Vallejo's recent declaration of bankruptcy, and city leaders calls to
"Public Safety" employees [Police, Fire etc.] to take cuts. The
budgets of these public safety departments in the case of Vallejo
accounted for well over half the city's total budget. Some
members of that community questioned if that was "out of whack" with
city residents’ over all needs.
Do we
consider police officers or firefighters as entitled to certain
privileges as workers? If they perceive that their value in a
community going under appreciated, do we expect them to not behave as
other workers might in a similar context? Historically, and
today the composition of most police forces is overwhelmingly made up
of individuals from working class backgrounds. Theories of
policing change; go in and out of popularity, yet greatly effect
officers’ daily activities. One might argue that distancing police
forces from the communities they work in was considered a good thing,
including as an anti-corruption measure. No doubt mistrust of the
police continues in many sectors of the public.
By my perception of it, the Montreal Police Strike of 1969 was an
aberration. It was a rare instance when law enforcement, which is in a
critical position of protecting the status quo, threw in its lot with
other sectors of the working class. They made legitimate demands,
and were swiftly repressed. Will we see a renewed interest by
such groups in the public sector, perhaps in future Vallejos, were the
police might flex their muscle like in Montreal1969? Given the
current economic conditions, it might not be excluded.
To view historical reportage use:
Archives de
Radio-Canada [in French, Government Channel, and quite different
than English]
http://archives.cbc.ca/politics/civil_unrest/clip/12238/
[CBC- English Government Channel]
June 1, 2008: Cold Cases
A cold case can be defined as an unsolved serious crime. The length of
time it has gone unsolved varies, possibly as little as two years. Cold
cases can be notorious incidents; most are unknown to the public. Many
major law enforcement agencies have Cold Case Review squads or
committees that now routinely reopen files. Both American and Canadian
TV have presented popular shows depicting the work of such units.
Regardless
of media presentation, factual and fictional, or the current existence
of cold case committees, such crimes can remain fascinating to the
public on emotional and political levels. Examples of such cases
include Jimmy Hoffa, the murder of Emmett Till, and the hijacking by DB
Cooper. The latter seems to have a life of its own in the collective
imagination, and recently new work has been conducted to try to solve
that crime. Nationally the JFK assassination, although not considered a
cold case, remains one in the eyes of a large sector of the
population. In local and regional areas, unresolved heinous
crimes, serial killings etc. live on with the public, as is the case of
the Zodiac killings in the SF Bay Area, which was made into a Hollywood
movie. Professor Martin Innes forwarded the notion of such cold
case investigations as "fixing the past," both scientifically and
socially through the production of a conclusion. Nazi hunters chasing
old war criminals clearly evoke the image of righting past wrongs.
I hypothesize that the interest in solving Cold Cases has arisen
from a confluence of phenomena. These include technological/scientific
advances, judicial shifts towards greater prosecutorial powers, the
victim's rights movement, and to a lesser degree, a rising
consciousness of wrongful convictions. The single strongest
factor appears to be technology, but others should not be
ignored.
Technologies, especially related to DNA identification, have been used
in many of these matters, and their use is indispensable in today’s
police work. A Cold Case police detective mentioned to me that often
cases are driven by new information from witnesses who were once
reluctant to come forward. Individuals or groups grappling with deep
psychological wounds describe the crying need to have "closure" so they
can move on with their lives.
However, we need to proceed with care. Un-prosecuted, open crimes and
cold case investigations might drive us to tamper with centuries old
statutes of limitations, as suggested by Scott Turow. Although a few
DNA-based exonerations garner much attention, budgetary limitations,
prosecutorial stubbornness and socio-political factors have also
prevented review in many cases. Cold cases might also do away with
ideas of redemption and rehabilitation we cherish. Use of Restorative
Justice measures, such as victim-perpetrator meetings, as used in
Australia, go unaddressed in our current cold case formula.
More research on exactly which cold cases are getting re-opened must be
done. Are there economic, demographic, racial, political, or
other factors at play when resource allocations in pursuing specific
cold cases are made? I merely suggest we have honest, open, and
broad public, academic, and legislative debate on this trend, so that
we may fully understand its consequences.
December 17 2007: Culture,
Rituals, and Contemporary Criminology
While far from an epidemic, or a major factor in contemporary
criminality, in the last few years there have been, throughout the
Western world a number of criminal cases involving "imported,"
culturally-based ritual practices that violate our current norms of
behavior and therefore attract a great deal of attention. "Honor
killings,” and female genital mutilation are two well-known, obvious
examples; inherited Albanian family feud vendettas are an example of a
less widely known sub-category.
These types of cases tend to stir up even more tension regarding
certain immigrant populations, so they are worth pondering as their
incidence is likely to rise in some places as new immigrant populations
increase in certain regions. There is a risk that one day such an
incident could exacerbate an already tense situation regarding
immigration issues either nationally or in some locality.
Currently we have a paucity of data on these types of crimes and their
prevalence, so more research in this area seems like a good idea.
One has to tread very carefully in how to approach these questions,
because there is a long and ugly history in the West of racist and
gender-based accusations of ritual crimes that contributed to such
atrocities as pogroms, witch burnings, lynchings and slaughters of
African Americans and indigenous groups. That said; there are
unquestionably certain ritual behaviors that do occur, and that have no
place in modern societies.
It is interesting to look back to an earlier campaign against ritual
crime. In 1906, the renowned Cuban ethnomusicologist and criminologist,
Fernando Ortiz, described ritual killings in Cuba in his book Los
Brujos Negros. He had recently returned to Cuba from studying
criminology with Cesar Lombroso in Italy, and was at the time deeply
influenced by Lombroso's positivist criminology. Ortiz's aim was to end
the violence employed by brujos (witch doctors) in relation to their
"magical" practices. At this early stage of his career, he viewed the
existence of these individuals as a moral dead weight on Cuban society,
and their elimination the only possible road to Cuba's general
progress, and that of its African descendants in particular. He later
broadened his views about Afro-Cuban culture, but Ortiz's work offers
us a case study that shows how difficult it is to separate legitimate
crime suppression from cultural misunderstanding and repression.
In fact in Africa, where there are still active
subcultures of sorcery, it is only quite recently that it has become
publicly discussed. This theme will be familiar to readers of the
highly popular mystery series, "No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency" which
takes place in southern Africa. The protagonist Mma Ramotswe, and her
mechanic friend discuss "the involvement of the country's most powerful
figures in witchcraft." Referring to a possible ritualistic murder she
is investigating, she comments "people have been forgetting about this
sort of thing...we can't do that." Notably, attitudes are
changing in Africa too. For example, in 2005 a new Gabonese association
aimed at fighting ritual kidnappings and murders, whose acronym is
"ALCR," came into being.
At this stage, "imported," culturally-based ritual crimes undoubtedly
represent only a very small fraction of current criminal offenses, but
their potential to exacerbate our society's already tense situation vis
a vis immigrants, especially those from newer groups, make their
further study by criminologists an important, and too often neglected,
area of research.
August 28 2007:
Schools are just now starting up for the glorious 2007-2008 year.
From pre-schools through universities most attention will get paid to
instruction and budgets. Others, reviewing school related events
of the last year might focus on the sad killings of students by one of
their own at Virginia Tech. There have also been court decisions
that will effect student life in high schools. One ruling
basically shot down a student's right to wear a garment with the words
"BONG HITS FOR JESUS." In another case, a school district was
limited in controlling what kids could wear, after a court shot down
the district for disciplining a student wearing socks with a TIGGER
logo on it. While free speech issues are very important, I am choosing
to focus on student "safety" concerns.
Those concerns deal with the safety students SHOULD have from being
detained, photographed, identified, interviewed or even arrested on
schools, by overly zealous law enforcement officers. Not all
regular officers, or SROs [School Resource Officers, who are those
uniformed police now found on many High Schools around the country.]
engage in aggressive and often racist practices. San Francisco Unified
School District has had a policy that says that students have a right
to have a parent or adult of their choosing present during law
enforcement "contacts." Based upon my own research, this policy
is not always enforced, although again many very diligent
administrators are aware of the policy and follow it carefully.
Police don't like these rules, as they view them as impeding their
right to "investigate" crimes. Schools have problems with it,
because it puts them in the middle of parents, police and students, and
they rightfully see their jobs as education. I was pleased to
learn of , and view it as a step in the right direction, a new policy
in the City Of Fairfield [CA] setting out new "guidelines" for what
police can do on campuses. It all stemmed from an incident in
March 2007, when two groups of Latino students were lined up and
photographed as part of police anti-gang work. Now, clear standards are
apparently in place to protect students from this type of police
practice.
There is no doubt that crimes happen at school, and police will be
called in. That's ok, so long as rights are not violated, and police
behavior is not biased.