Tutorials Old Articles
Is a 12" PowerBook G4 from 2005 Still Useful?
by Alan Zisman (c) 2012
published in Low End Mac
July 26, 2012
Back in the early days of personal computing, PC Magazine editor Bill
Machrone proposed what he humbly referred to as "Machrone's Law". He
said, "The computer you really want always costs $5,000."
A decade later, desktop prices had dropped, so he amended it, noting
that the computer you really wanted was a laptop.
It's really hard to drop $5,000 on a personal
computer these days - even a laptop. Apple's new high-end MacBook Pro
with Retina Display starts at Cdn$2,229, and even maxing out the CPU,
solid state drive, and memory totals a "mere" $3,799.
In the real world, money is always an issue - at least for me and I
assume for you. And this means that when I'm looking for the computer
I'm going to get, rather than the one that I might want, there are
Price is important, but it's not the only factor. Speed and power are
important - but once we pass the speed and power needed to get work
done, increased speed ad power become less important. Besides, these
days a fast network or Internet connection may count for more.
Similarly storage capacity. Yes, more is better, but I can make do with
Portability/mobility counts for a lot with me. As many have found with
digital cameras, picture quality is often less important than
portability: You won't be able to take any pictures if you've left your
high quality, but heavy, camera at home. Hence the attraction of
relatively low-quality cameras built into mobile phones.
Recently, I bought a secondhand Mac
PowerBook from LEM-writer Jason Schrader - the 12" PowerBook G4 model
that for a couple of years in the mid-2000s was Apple's answer to the
request for a laptop that was relatively small, relatively powerful,
and relatively affordable; it remains among many longtime Mac owners'
The 12" PowerBook debuted in January 2003 with an 867 MHz G4 PowerPC
CPU; the model I got was one of the last version released, sporting a
1.5 GHz G4; that version was sold between January 2005 and May 2006.
All the 12" PowerBooks feature 12.1" 1024 x 768 pixel displays - the
same resolution as the 9.7" displays on the original iPad (2010) and
the (still for sale) iPad 2. Mine has a 60 GB hard drive (80 and 100 GB
drives were also available) and a "SuperDrive", a DVD reader/burner.
The 12" PowerBooks all had 256 MB memory soldered in plus an additional
memory slot; adding a 1 GB memory module maxes the RAM at 1.25 GB.
This model originally sold for $1,699 with the SuperDrive ($1,499 with
a "Combo" drive that can read/write CDs but only read DVDs). I paid
under $200 for it.
Let's compare it to a few other Apple models of recent years, two
chosen because I happen to own them, and one because it's the currently
available Mac most like the 12" PowerBook.
12" PowerBook vs. 13"
Apple released the 13" Aluminum MacBook in late 2008. The next year,
that model was updated with a FireWire 800 port and SD Card slot and
re-christened the 13" MacBook Pro. With various upgrades over the
years, it remains in the product line today.
I've got the original version with
a 2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo processor and removable battery - later models
sealed in the battery, allowing for a larger battery and longer battery
Both laptops weigh about the same amount - the PowerBook weighs in at
4.6 lb., the MacBook at 4.5. Both have similar thickness and depth, but
the MacBook is nearly 2" wider to support its 13" 10:6 display. Those
2" makes the PowerBook seem significantly more tote-able.
The MacBook's display is brighter than the PowerBook's and has 1280 x
800 resolution - note that while this is significantly more pixels in
the horizontal dimension, it's really not that much more vertically.
The result - the older PowerBook screen is more comparable to the
MacBook's than I had thought it would be.
(An aside: even the current 13" MacBook Pros have that same 1280 x 800
resolution, a big disappointment to me, especially since Apple offers a
higher resolution screen on its 13" MacBook Air.)
While both feature aluminum bodies, the MacBook's unibody construction
was carved out of a solid metal slab. The PowerBook is built out of a
bunch of thin panels held together with lots of teeny screens. The
result is that it gets dented out of shape and looks a bit shopworn.
Battery life is similar between these two systems - both advertised
about five hours of battery life when new, although Apple claims seven
hours of battery life for the current 13" MacBook Pro. Both systems are
getting between 3 and 3-1/2 hours of life on their batteries now.
Both include wired ethernet and 802.11 WiFi. Although the MacBook's
networking (both wired and wireless) is faster in theory, in the real
world there's not much difference.
The MacBook does include significantly more storage - i.e. hard drive
space. It shipped with a 160 GB drive, which I replaced with a 512 GB
model. Nice feature - replacing the hard drive in this model is quick
and easy; in subsequent 13" MacBook Pros, this has become much more
difficult. I could put a larger ATA hard drive in the PowerBook, but
that's also not one of Apple's more DIY-friendly designs.
The MacBook's 2.0 GHz dual-core Intel Core 2 Duo processor is newer,
faster, and more powerful than the PowerBook's 1.5 GHz PowerPC G4, and
that allows it to run more recent operating system versions and
software. More on that later.
Refurbished and used 13" aluminum MacBooks on eBay are currently priced
in the Cdn$600 to $780 range.
12" PowerBook vs. Original
I've also got an original iPad.
With a 12.1" screen compared to the iPad's 9.7", the PowerBook is a bit
longer and wider - but not all that much. It's more than twice as thick
(1.18" vs. 0.5") and nearly three times as heavy (4.6 vs. 1.6 lb.). The
iPad is a clear winner in portability.
While both feature 1024 x 768 pixel screen resolutions, the iPad can be
used in your choice of portrait and landscape (vertical and horizontal)
orientations; holding it vertically is much nicer for reading ebooks,
for instance, which a horizontal orientation works well for watching
videos. This gives the iPad a usability edge as well.
My iPad is the 3G model (an added $130 cost plus a monthly cost for
mobile data service); this gives me Internet access away from WiFi
connections, something I find especially convenient since I'm not a
smartphone owner. Again, the iPad wins - though having a wired network
port on the PowerBook is handy from time to time. (A surprising number
of hotel rooms have wired networking but no WiFi.)
My iPad has 64 GB of storage, which is pretty comparable to the
PowerBook's 60 GB - note however, that the base iPad (even in the
newest model) starts at 16 GB, and a 32 GB model is also sold.
Neither the PowerBook nor my original iPad has a built-in camera. I
don't care. Battery life on the iPad - originally rated around 10 hours
and still around 8 hours, is significantly better than the PowerBook.
On the other hand, the PowerBook has a built-in keyboard and trackpad,
an optical drive, and can run standard Mac software (at least versions
compatible with its older operating system). The iPad, running iOS,
runs lots and lots of apps - but for basic tasks like word processing -
or for printing, scanning, ripping music from CDs, and many more - the
PowerBook is superior.
While iPad prices start at Cdn$519, the additional storage added $200
to the price, and the 3G networking added $130 for a total of $849.
Refurbished models like mine are being sold on eBay for $300.
12" PowerBook vs. Current
11" MacBook Air
If money were no object, I might spring for the system that occupies
the same niche in Apple's ecosystem today that the 12" PowerBook held
back in its day - the 11" MacBook Air.
The current model was most recently updated in June 2012 with prices
starting at Cdn$1,029 (US$999) for a model with a 64 GB solid state
drive and a 1.7 GHz Intel Core i5 processor. (Larger SSDs are
If we can ignore that the dual-core processor is much more powerful
than the G4 and that the solid-state drive is much faster than the
PowerBook's conventional hard drive (and that the Air has 4 GB of
memory compared to the Power Book's 1.25 GB), these specs would seem
The Air's 11" screen has 1366 x 768 pixel resolution - more
horizontally, but the same vertically as the PowerBook. Again, for
tasks involving vertical scrolling - like reading ebooks or long online
articles, these screens may not be that much different.
The Air is a bit wider and not quite as deep as the PowerBook - but
only half as thick at its thickest point (it tapers from 0.68" at the
back to a mere 0.11" at the front). And with a weight of 2.38 lb., it's
about half as heavy.
Like the 12" PowerBook when it was new, the battery on the Air is rated
for 5 hours of use.
No ethernet built into the Air, and no optical drive, though both can
be added externally.
The Air runs current Mac OS versions and can run current software; the
PowerBook is limited to older versions of OS X and many software titles.
The 12" PowerBook Suffices
What about the operating system and software, then?
The original 2003 12" PowerBook originally
shipped with OS X 10.2, with later models coming with OS X 10.3 to
10.4.2. For G4 PowerBooks with less than the maximum memory (768 MB is
common), OS X 10.4 Tiger offers the best performance. I'm running OS X
10.5.8 Leopard on mine.
It's been awhile since I've spent much time with Leopard; going back to
it, I like it. It has a similar look to the more recent OS X 10.6 Snow
Leopard and includes features like Dashboard (which I ignore) and Time
Machine (which is handy).
As well, it is compatible with more relatively recent software than
Tiger - though in a few cases (such as the Google Chrome web browser),
software that claims to run with Leopard is only available for
Intel-powered systems - PowerPCs like mine need not apply.
There's a bonus to running Leopard (or 10.6 Snow Leopard on an Intel
system) rather than 10.7 Lion or the just-released 10.8 Mountain Lion -
the ability to run older OS X software created for PowerPC processors -
either natively or using Rosetta on Intel systems. That has already
come in handy for me a couple of times. As well, I was able to use a
version of Cisco's Cisco Connect utility that wouldn't run on my
MacBook's Lion system to manage my Linksys router.
(A bonus for staying with 10.4 Tiger - it's the last OS X version that
supports "Classic Mode", allowing the use of pre-OS X applications).
While neither Firefox nor Chrome support PowerPC systems, I'm happy
with the TenFourFox browser, a modern PowerPC version built
on Firefox 10 code, thanks to Low End Mac for Simon Royal's article on enabling Flash on TenFourFox.
is a perfectly good OpenOffice version for PowerPC systems. All told, I
don't feel like I'm missing anything important to me - and by restoring
the apps that were taken from me when Lion dropped Rosetta support, I
In conclusion - it's worthwhile, but maybe just for now.
The 12" G4 PowerBook is a nice portable system that compares reasonably
well to my newer 13" aluminum MacBook. It's neither as fast nor as
lightweight as a new 11" MacBook Air, but it's also significantly less
With its memory maxed out and running Leopard, it provides a reasonable
level of performance and a modern look and feel.
An iPad - even my original iPad - is significantly lighter and a better
ebook reader, but the PowerBook is better for typing, printing,
scanning, and other functions best done on a laptop. My iPad has 3G
connectivity, which is an important feature for me when I'm travelling
- but only a minority of iPads have mobile data capabilities.
As a result, I can happily recommend it to other users looking for a
mobile option on a restricted budget.
At least for now.
$200 has been the sweet spot for non-Apple tablets; HP and RIM, for
instance, only sold reasonable numbers of their respective tablet
models when they dropped the price to this level. Amazon's Kindle
(running a highly-modified version of Android) sold in large numbers at
this price point before Christmas, and before word of mouth of poor
performance had a chance to get out.
Google recently released a 7" Android tablet, the Nexus 7, for $199
(with 8 GB of storage) or $259 (with 16 GB); initial reviews have been
very positive, commenting on generally high build quality and fast
performance. I haven't tried one yet, but I do have one on order and
got an email today that it has (finally) shipped.
Rumours are that Apple may respond with a 7.8" iPad model - let's
fantasize a $299 price point.
While the 12" PowerBook won't magically become less useful if the Nexus
7 or iPad Mini are successful and widely available, will anyone really
care if new, more mobile tablets become widespread and available for
not too much more money?