Lantastic 6.0-- great system for small networks
struggles...
by Alan Zisman
(c) 1995. First
published in Our Computer Player, November 1995
Lantastic 6.0
Artisoft Inc.
2202 N. Forbes Blvd..
Tucson, AZ 85745 USA
1-800-233-5564
fax: 602-670-7101
http://www.artisoft.com
$119 (US list) for 1 node, $499 (US) for five nodes
You've got to feel a little sorry for Artisoft... for
years, their Lantastic
Network Operating System, now in version 6.0, has been the best-selling
example of a small network-- a network for small businesses, schools,
even
homes... anyone with from two to two dozen or so machines to tie
together,
but not needing the expense and complication of a big, server-based
network
like Novell Netware.
Tieing together over 2.7 million machines last year,
Lantastic has successfully
survived competition from networking giant Novell, who clearly aimed
their
Lite version at the small networks that have been Lantastic's strength.
Lantastic version 6.0 is a bigger program than the
previous version,
which came on a single 3 1/2" diskette. It adds Windows (3.1) utilities
and installation, accounting for much of the added bulk. Installing
Lantastic,
you can choose to set up each machine as either a Server or a
Workstation--
Servers share their drives, and optionally resources such as printers,
across the network... workstations can use resources on servers, but do
not share their own resources; a simple network could set each machine
as a server, but setting up a machine that way requires a larger DOS
TSR
file than setting it up as a workstation. In either case, the ram
required
is relatively small, compared to other networks.
Because you can set each machine up to share files and
other resources
with the network, Lantastic is an example of a peer-to-peer network.
This
is in contrast to the big networks, such as Netware, that have a
dedicated
file server, which provides services to a large number of passive
clients.
Lantastic offers file sharing, and easy sharing of
printing and cd-roms
across the network, an obvious benefit for many small offices, and even
some homes with multiple computers. In addition, it provides optional
e-mail
across the network, and scheduling. In a business environment,
Lantastic
mini-networks can be connected to Netware and Windows-based servers, at
a cost of additional conventional ram. In addition, there are strong
security
features... you can set up multiple levels of access, providing users
different
abilities to write, create, or modify files in different directories on
the server's drives.
As well, it includes its share of frills... users with
sound cards,
for example, can record voice messages, and send them across the
network.
While Lantastic is DOS-based, it works well under
Windows 3.1, including
a full collection of Windows utilities, both for controlling the
network,
and for e-mail, scheduling and other functions.
Because Lantastic is aimed at small networks,
primarily in smaller businesses,
it has to be usable by companies that lack a trained and dedicated
Network
Manager, as you'll often find babysitting the big corporate networks.
And
it pretty much succeeds. If you have no networking background, you
really
should look through the documentation before diving in and installing
the
software, but everything is pretty well-explained; there's "A Basic
Guide
to Everyday Networking", as well as a bigger reference manual.
Artisoft's
phone support is good-- though you have to pay for the long distance
call
to Arizona.
Everything I've mentioned sounds good... so why should
we be feeling
sorry for Artisoft?
The big problem isn't with Lantastic-- it works as
advertised, and fills
a useful market niche. In many ways, however, this niche is
disappearing
before their eyes. Starting with Windows for Workgroups, basic
peer-to-peer
networking has been included in many users' operating environment.
If you bought Windows for Workgroups for the speed
increase in 32-bit
File Access, you got peer-to-peer networking at the same time. And if
you
upgrade either that version of standard Windows 3.1 to Windows 95, you
get peer-to-peer networking whether you need it or not.
Lantastic provides superior security, more options for
protecting server
files and directories, and fancier print sharing options than either
Windows
for Workgroups, or Windows 95. But that distinction may not mean much
to
many potential customers.... Before, if you wanted a simple network,
you
had to buy a dedicated network program-- and in most cases, that meant
Lantastic. But now, the basic networking provided right in the
operating
system package may prove enough for many users.
Artisoft has promised a Windows 95 version in a few
months-- it's currently
being beta tested. And they have promised that it will include an
installable
file system-- perhaps answering one complaint many power users have had
about Win95... it's continued reliance on the antiquated DOS FAT file
system.
Certainly, this will provide more features than Windows 95's core
networking.
We'll have to see whether that's enough to allow Artisoft to maintain
Lantastic's
position as the most commercially successful small networking software.
If you're sticking to DOS or Windows 3.1 for the
foreseeable future,
and you want to share computer resources around the office or small
workgroup,
the purchase of a few ethernet cards and copies of Lantastic may be a
good
solution... but if you're planning an upgrade to Windows 95, you may
find
that meets your needs.